Election Information Standard · v1.2

A first pass, not a verdict.

Click anywhere to continue

EvaluationAI first passOct 16, 2026

Pinecrest Township Elections

pinecresttwp.org

A thin submission with the basic facts but little process. Not on a .gov domain, no dates on pages, a silent polling place change in 2024, and nothing machine-readable. Several findings are low confidence because the documents say little.

28Emerging2 of 24 criteria met
Reviewer progress0 of 24 confirmed
met
2
partial
9
incomplete
13

Official status and authenticity

Score 50 · 0 of 4 confirmed by reviewer

Voters can tell at a glance that the site is run by the election office, and can verify it.

  • OSA-1Official domain or verified ownership

    A .org domain with no ownership statement.

    Not on .gov and no ownership statement.

    Incomplete
    High
  • OSA-2Secure connection

    HTTPS enabled by the vendor in 2023.

    Met
    High
  • OSA-3Office identity and contact

    Address and phone on the Contact page; the Clerk is named on a separate Officials page.

    Met
    Medium
  • OSA-4Guidance on look-alike sites

    No guidance on look-alike sites.

    Incomplete
    High

Voter information clarity

Score 40 · 0 of 5 confirmed by reviewer

The essentials of registering and voting are complete, dated, and written for a first-time voter.

  • VIC-1Registration deadlines and methods

    Deadline given as '30 days before the election' rather than a date; methods incomplete.

    Partial
    Medium
  • VIC-2Polling place and ballot lookup

    Two locations and hours are listed; no lookup and no ballot information.

    Partial
    Medium
  • VIC-3ID requirements in plain language

    'Bring a photo ID' with no list and no stated alternative.

    Partial
    Medium
  • VIC-4Mail ballot timeline and tracking

    Absentee process described loosely, with no dates and no tracking.

    Partial
    Medium
  • VIC-5Sample ballot before early voting

    Sample ballot posted on a physical bulletin board only.

    Incomplete
    High

Accessibility and language access

Score 25 · 0 of 4 confirmed by reviewer

Voters with disabilities and voters who read other languages get the same information, in forms they can use.

  • ALA-1Accessibility statement

    No accessibility statement.

    No accessibility statement.

    Incomplete
    High
  • ALA-2Required language versions

    No translated content; coverage obligations not addressed.

    Incomplete
    Medium
  • ALA-3Accessible voting options

    Residents are told to call for assistance; accessible options are not described.

    Partial
    Low
  • ALA-4Usable on mobile and without PDFs

    Template described as mobile friendly; not verified, and the sample ballot is not online.

    Partial
    Low

Results and process transparency

Score 25 · 0 of 4 confirmed by reviewer

The public can see how results are reported, checked, and certified, and who may watch.

  • RPT-1Results schedule and labeling

    Results labeled unofficial, but first released as a photo on social media with no schedule.

    Partial
    Medium
  • RPT-2Canvass and certification timeline

    Canvass schedule not posted.

    Incomplete
    High
  • RPT-3Post-election audit procedure

    No audit information.

    Incomplete
    High
  • RPT-4Observer access and chain of custody

    Observers admitted with notice; custody described in one sentence.

    Partial
    Medium

Accuracy, updates and corrections

Score 13 · 0 of 4 confirmed by reviewer

Voters can tell how current a page is, see what changed, and get a straight answer to false claims.

  • AUC-1Last-updated stamps

    No last-updated dates on any page.

    Incomplete
    High
  • AUC-2Corrections and change notices

    A polling place was moved silently in 2024.

    A silent change to a polling place sent voters to the wrong location.

    Incomplete
    High
  • AUC-3Rumor response page

    No rumor response page.

    Incomplete
    High
  • AUC-4Public error-reporting channel

    General contact details only; no stated error process.

    Partial
    Low

Data and interoperability

Score 0 · 0 of 3 confirmed by reviewer

Dates, places, and results are published in formats that search engines, voter tools, and researchers can read.

  • DIO-1Structured data for dates and places

    No structured data.

    Incomplete
    High
  • DIO-2Machine-readable results

    Results published as a photo of the tape.

    Incomplete
    High
  • DIO-3Polling-place feed or API

    No polling place feed.

    Incomplete
    High